Journal
Molecular Autism
Publication Date
10-20-2020
Volume
11
Issue
1
First Page
82
Document Type
Open Access Publication
DOI
10.1186/s13229-020-00381-y
Rights and Permissions
Eggebrecht, A.T., Dworetsky, A., Hawks, Z. et al. Brain function distinguishes female carriers and non-carriers of familial risk for autism. Molecular Autism 11, 82 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13229-020-00381-y This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Recommended Citation
Eggebrecht, Adam T; Dworetsky, Ally; Hawks, Zoë; Coalson, Rebecca; Adeyemo, Babatunde; Davis, Savannah; Gray, Daniel; McMichael, Alana; Petersen, Steven E; Constantino, John N; and Pruett, John R, "Brain function distinguishes female carriers and non-carriers of familial risk for autism." Molecular Autism. 11, 1. 82 (2020).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/472
Supplementary information containing a figure detailing the predigrees of the CF group, tables containing details on regions of interest for the hypothesis-driven analyses and brain-wide exploratory analyses, and a brief discussion on differences in cohorts in this and the Kaiser 2010 study.
