Bedside small-bowel challenge vs. fluoroscopic series for SBO: A cost effectiveness analysis

Authors

Aravinda Krishna Ganapathy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Liam Cunningham, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
M Hunter Lanier, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Selasi Nakhaima, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Madelyn Thiel, Barnes Jewish Hospital
Daniel Hoffman, Barnes Jewish Hospital
Obeid Ilahi, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
David H Ballard, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Vincent M Mellnick, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Journal

Tomography

Publication Date

9-26-2025

Volume

11

Issue

10

First Page

107

Document Type

Open Access Publication

DOI

10.3390/tomography11100107

Rights and Permissions

Ganapathy AK, Cunningham L, Lanier MH, Nakhaima S, Thiel M, Hoffman D, Ilahi O, Ballard DH, Mellnick VM. Bedside Small-Bowel Challenge vs. Fluoroscopic Series for SBO: A Cost Effectiveness Analysis. Tomography. 2025 Sep 26;11(10):107. doi: 10.3390/tomography11100107 Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Recommended Citation

Ganapathy, Aravinda Krishna; Cunningham, Liam; Lanier, M Hunter; Nakhaima, Selasi; Thiel, Madelyn; Hoffman, Daniel; Ilahi, Obeid; Ballard, David H; and Mellnick, Vincent M, "Bedside small-bowel challenge vs. fluoroscopic series for SBO: A cost effectiveness analysis." Tomography. 11, 10. 107 (2025).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/5566