Multicenter evaluation of computer automated versus traditional surveillance of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections

Authors

Michael Y. Lin, Rush University
Keith F. Woeltje, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Yosef M. Khan, Ohio State University - Main Campus
Bala Hota, Rush UniversityFollow
Joshua A. Doherty, Washington University School of Medicine in St. LouisFollow
Tara B. Borlawsky, Ohio State University - Main Campus
Kurt Stevenson, Ohio State University - Main Campus
Scott K. Fridkin, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, AtlantaFollow
Robert A. Weinstein, Rush University
William E. Trick, Rush University

Journal

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

Publication Date

2014

Volume

35

Issue

12

Inclusive Pages

1483-1490

Document Type

Open Access Publication

DOI

10.1086/678602

Rights and Permissions

Multicenter Evaluation of Computer Automated versus Traditional Surveillance of Hospital-Acquired Bloodstream Infections Michael Y. Lin, MD, MPH; Keith F. Woeltje, MD, PhD; Yosef M. Khan, MBBS, MPH, PhD; Bala Hota, MD, MPH; Joshua A. Doherty, BS; Tara B. Borlawsky, MA; Kurt B. Stevenson, MD, MPH; Scott K. Fridkin, MD; Robert A. Weinstein, MD; William E. Trick, MD; for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epicenter Program Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 35, No. 12 (December 2014), pp. 1483-1490 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Article DOI: 10.1086/678602

Recommended Citation

Lin, Michael Y.; Woeltje, Keith F.; Khan, Yosef M.; Hota, Bala; Doherty, Joshua A.; Borlawsky, Tara B.; Stevenson, Kurt; Fridkin, Scott K.; Weinstein, Robert A.; and Trick, William E., "Multicenter evaluation of computer automated versus traditional surveillance of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections." Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 35, 12. 1483-1490. (2014).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/3620