Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publication Date
2016
Volume
5
Issue
3
Inclusive Pages
e003137
Document Type
Open Access Publication
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.115.003137
Rights and Permissions
Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography?: Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial Quynh A. Truong, Joshua Schulman‐Marcus, Pearl Zakroysky, Eric T. Chou, John T. Nagurney, Jerome L. Fleg, David A. Schoenfeld, James E. Udelson, Udo Hoffmann, and Pamela K. Woodard J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5:e003137, originally published March 22, 2016, doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.003137 Copyright 2016 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Recommended Citation
Truong, Quynh A.; Schulman-Marcus, Joshua; Zakroysky, Pearl; Chou, Eric T.; Nagurney, John T.; Fleg, Jerome L.; Schoenfeld, David A.; Udelson, James E.; Hoffmann, Udo; and Woodard, Pamela K., "Coronary CT angiography versus standard emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain and diabetic patients: Is there benefit with early coronary CT angiography? Results of the randomized comparative effectiveness ROMICAT II trial." Journal of the American Heart Association. 5, 3. e003137. (2016).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/4752
