Dear reviewers: Responses to common reviewer critiques about infant neuroimaging studies

Authors

Marta Korom, University of Delaware
M Catalina Camacho, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Courtney A Filippi, National Institute of Mental Health
Roxane Licandro, Medical University of Vienna
Lucille A Moore, Oregon Health and Science University
Alexander Dufford, Yale University
Lilla Zöllei, Massachusetts General Hospital
Alice M Graham, Oregon Health and Science University
Marisa Spann, Columbia University
Brittany Howell, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
FIT'NG
Sarah Shultz, Emory University
Dustin Scheinost, Yale University

Journal

Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Publication Date

2-1-2022

Volume

53

First Page

101055

Document Type

Open Access Publication

DOI

10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101055

Rights and Permissions

Korom M, Camacho MC, Filippi CA, Licandro R, Moore LA, Dufford A, Zöllei L, Graham AM, Spann M, Howell B; FIT’NG, Shultz S, Scheinost D. Dear reviewers: Responses to common reviewer critiques about infant neuroimaging studies. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2022 Feb;53:101055. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101055. © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Recommended Citation

Korom, Marta; Camacho, M Catalina; Filippi, Courtney A; Licandro, Roxane; Moore, Lucille A; Dufford, Alexander; Zöllei, Lilla; Graham, Alice M; Spann, Marisa; Howell, Brittany; FIT'NG; Shultz, Sarah; and Scheinost, Dustin, "Dear reviewers: Responses to common reviewer critiques about infant neuroimaging studies." Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 53, 101055 (2022).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/11496