More than meets the IRB – American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) research ethics: Considering the Havasupai Tribe case

Authors

Molly Tovar, Washington University in St Louis, Kathryn M. Buder Center for American Indian Studies
Peter Coser, Jr., Washington University in St Louis, Kathryn M. Buder Center for American Indian
Michael Leary, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Document Type

Digital

Publication Date

7-2014

Notes

In this seventh installment of “More Than Meets the IRB,” Molly Tovar (PhD, Director of the Kathryn M. Buder Center for American Indian Studies) and Peter Coser, Jr. (MHR), talk with us about ethical and cultural issues related to American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) research. Our guests for this podcast have extensive background in AIAN research and share with us their experiences in the field. Topics discussed include cultural nuances of IRB review, the use of Community Advisory Boards, and practicable tips for the IRB review of AIAN research. This installment brings to life the important research ethical issues made more visible by recent events, such as the Havasupai Tribe case.

A good introduction to the Havasupai Tribe case referenced during the conversation:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/22/us/22dna.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Streaming Media

Recommended Citation

Tovar, Molly; Coser, Jr., Peter; and Leary, Michael, "More than meets the IRB – American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) research ethics: Considering the Havasupai Tribe case" (2014). HRPO Podcasts. Paper 7.
Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/hrpopods/7