Anesthesia clinical workload estimated from electronic health record documentation vs billed relative value units

Authors

Sunny S Lou, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Laura R Baratta, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Daphne Lew, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Derek Harford, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Michael S Avidan, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Thomas Kannampallil, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

Journal

JAMA Network Open

Publication Date

8-1-2023

Volume

6

Issue

8

First Page

e2328514

Document Type

Open Access Publication

DOI

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28514

Rights and Permissions

Lou SS, Baratta LR, Lew D, Harford D, Avidan MS, Kannampallil T. Anesthesia Clinical Workload Estimated From Electronic Health Record Documentation vs Billed Relative Value Units. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(8):e2328514. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28514. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2023 Lou SS et al. JAMA Network Open.

Recommended Citation

Lou, Sunny S; Baratta, Laura R; Lew, Daphne; Harford, Derek; Avidan, Michael S; and Kannampallil, Thomas, "Anesthesia clinical workload estimated from electronic health record documentation vs billed relative value units." JAMA Network Open. 6, 8. e2328514 (2023).
https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/oa_4/2223

Department

ICTS (Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences)

Additional Links

Supplemental material is available for this article at publisher site.