Comparison of automated versus traditional nerve conduction study methods for median nerve testing in a general worker population

Authors

Ann Marie Dale, Washington University School of Medicine in St. LouisFollow
Folasad Agboola, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Amber Yun, Saint Louis University School of Public Health
Angelique Zeringue, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
Muhammed T. Al-Lozi, Washington University School of Medicine in St. LouisFollow
Bradley A. Evanoff, Washington University School of Medicine in St. LouisFollow

Document Type

Article

Journal

PM&R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation

Volume

7

Issue

3

Inclusive Pages

276-82

Publication Date

2015

Notes

NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in PM&R. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in PM&R, Volume 7, Issue 3, March 2015, doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.10.003.

Recommended Citation

Dale, Ann Marie; Agboola, Folasad; Yun, Amber; Zeringue, Angelique; Al-Lozi, Muhammed T.; and Evanoff, Bradley A., "Comparison of automated versus traditional nerve conduction study methods for median nerve testing in a general worker population". PM&R: the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 276-82. 2015.